| Structured settlements - examples |
|
Warning: This information may not apply to the current year. Check the content carefully to ensure it is applicable to your circumstances.
Caution Please note: The amounts quoted below are examples only. Amounts of compensation will vary from case to case. A lawyer will be able to provide advice about personal injury compensation. These examples illustrate the application and components of structured settlements. Participants in a typical structured settlement
A structured settlementAt the age of 19, Paul was seriously injured when a public walkway collapsed under him. Paul's lawyer made a claim for compensation against the public authority responsible for the walkway. After negotiations between the parties, the public authority admitted liability (fault). The following settlement agreement was reached between the parties:
The annuity payments will be exempt from tax when received by Paul. The immediate cash sum will also be tax-exempt. A structured settlement involving a minor and a trustAt the age of 10, Chris was in a car accident when the car driven by his father collided with another car. He sustained a serious head injury, resulting in permanent brain damage. Chris is permanently unable to work and his financial affairs need to be managed by a trustee on his behalf. A claim for compensation was made against the driver of the other car (the defendant). The other driver was insured, so their insurance company defended the claim. Chris's lawyer negotiated a structured settlement agreement in which the defendant's insurance company agreed to pay the following compensation:
This settlement agreement was approved by the court (as required under state law because Chris, being under 18 years old, has a legal incapacity). The annuity payments are tax-exempt when received by Chris's trustee on his behalf. * The minimum level of monthly support requires that the pension be equal to or greater than the maximum basic rate of the age pension. The payments under the first annuity to Chris were greater than the minimum monthly level of support at the date of the settlement order. A structured settlement involving a single personal injury lump sumA structured settlement agreement included the following payments:
The personal injury annuity payments and the personal injury lump sum payment will be tax-exempt.
A structured settlement involving a series of personal injury lump sumsAt the age of 32, Robert was involved in a motorbike accident and acquired a spinal cord injury resulting in quadriplegia. A motorist failed to stop at a red light and the car hit Robert's bike. Robert engaged a lawyer to make a claim for compensation for personal injury against the motorist. The motorist was insured and the insurance company defended the claim on its client's behalf. The parties reached the following structured settlement agreement:
It is expected that Robert will use these payments to replace his wheelchair every five years and to cover other expenses. The personal injury annuity payments and the personal injury lump sum payment will be tax-exempt. Two annuities that together meet the minimum monthly level of supportTony was seriously injured because of medical negligence, for which the hospital admitted liability. Tony and the hospital agreed to the following settlement agreement:
These annuities together total $17,000, which more than meets the minimum monthly level of support requirement. The payments from both annuities and the lump sum payment will be tax-exempt. Court deciding liability and no immediate cash paymentHelen acquired quadriplegia as a result of a car accident. A claim for compensation was made against the other driver involved in the accident. The other driver's insurer defended the claim. The parties (Helen and the other driver's insurer) could not agree on who was at fault so the case went to court and a judge made a decision that the other driver was 70% liable. The judge indicated that a settlement figure of $1.5 million could be considered appropriate and the case was adjourned so that the parties could consider arranging a structured settlement. The parties were able to reach the following structured settlement agreement:
Note that Helen had a private insurance policy that provided her with sufficient money to pay her debts and set up her living arrangements, so she did not need an immediate cash lump sum as part of her structured settlement. The personal injury annuity and personal injury lump sum payments are tax-exempt. Also, the court is not required to endorse this settlement. Defendant pays compensation in the form of an annuity (not a structured settlement)Kerry was injured at birth through the negligent use of forceps. The doctor's employer, a local government health authority, admitted liability and agreed to a settlement under which it would pay an annuity to Kerry over her lifetime. The doctor's employer is not a life insurance company or a state insurer. As the annuity has not been purchased from a life insurance company or a state insurer, it will not be exempt from tax. Effect of a guarantee periodGeoff is an injured person who is receiving a tax-free personal injury annuity under a structured settlement. The annuity has a guarantee period of 10 years from the date of settlement. Geoff's sons Michael and Robin are specified in the annuity contract as the reversionary beneficiaries. Geoff dies five years from the date of settlement. Michael and Robin are entitled to receive the payments that would have been payable to Geoff over the remaining five years of the guarantee period, or a lump sum to the value of the remaining payments (less any increases). With either choice, the payments would be exempt from income tax. Injured person uses a lump sum to purchase an annuity (not a structured settlement)David settles a claim against Anne for a personal injury he has sustained. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Anne is obliged to pay David a lump sum amount. David uses the lump sum to purchase an annuity from a life insurance company. The annuity is not a personal injury annuity and therefore will not qualify for the tax exemption. If the settlement agreement had specified that Anne or her insurer would use the lump sum to purchase a personal injury annuity from a life insurance company, the arrangement would be a structured settlement (assuming all the other requirements of the tax legislation were met, including the minimum level of support). Court approving a structured settlement for a minorAt the age of nine, Peter was struck by a car and sustained a serious injury. When Peter was 15, his legal personal representative made a claim for compensation against the driver of the car. The driver has insurance and the insurance company defended the claim. The claim was settled. Peter is a minor and considered to be unable to manage financial matters so the settlement involves the establishment of a trust and court approval. The settlement agreed to and approved by the court is as follows:
If all the eligibility conditions are met, the annuity will be exempt from tax in the hands of the trustee and also when payments are made to Peter, or applied for the benefit of Peter. The lump sum is also tax-exempt. The exemption does not apply to investment income derived by the trustee from the investment of the lump sum of $250,000. Person injured while overseasWhile holidaying overseas, Phil was severely injured in a motor vehicle accident. He has returned to Australia. Phil seeks compensation from the driver of the other car under the laws of the nation where the accident occurred. The other driver is insured and the insurance company reaches an agreement with Phil. Under the terms of the agreement, the insurance company pays an immediate lump sum of $300,000 to Phil and purchases a personal injury annuity of $25,000 per year from an Australian life insurance company. This annuity will be paid monthly and indexed to the CPI. The lump sum payment and the personal injury annuity are exempt from income tax. However, if the annuity had been purchased from a foreign life insurance company that was not registered under the Life Insurance Act 1995, the annuity would not qualify for exemption from income tax. |